Art, Process and What Neurodiversity Can Do (essay coming soon)
“Affective ruptures - “which themselves utilize existing materials - are the fertile ground for new forms of representation, new signifying regimes. Deterritorialization is always accompanied by reterritorialization in this sense. A minor practice must then be understood as always in process, as always becoming - as generating new forms through a break with, but also utilization of, the old. It is also in this sense that the argument might be made that a practice can still be ‘activated,’ or become minor, even it is located ‘within’ a major institution, or has otherwise ‘become major’” - Simon O’Sullivan. Art Encounters: Deleuze and Guattari, 2006, 73.
“In refusing to seek answers, and in continuing to pose questions as aporias, as paradoxes - that is to insist that they have no readily available solutions - is to face the task of not revolution i.e. the overthrow the old (whether capitalism, patriarchy, binary oppositions, or prevailing modes of radicality) but, less romantically or glamourously, endless negotiation, the equation of one’s life with struggle, a wearying ideal but one perhaps that can make us less invested in any one struggle and more capable to bearing up to continuous effort to go against the relentless forces of sameness, more inventive in the kinds of subversion we seek, and more joyous in the kinds of struggle we choose to be called into” - Elizabeth Grosz. Space, Time and Perversion, 1995, 6.